萝莉

“台湾义勇队附设第二台湾医院档案”见证两岸同胞共御外侮历史_我的网站

一 |     AI摘要      “台湾义勇队附设第二台湾医院档案”入选浙江档案文献遗产名录。该档案记录台胞在衢抗战及应对细菌战史实，见证两岸同胞共御外侮。    

    China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post. 
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge. 
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said. 
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine. 
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation. 
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。

二 |          杭州8月18日电（记者 冯源）“台湾义勇队附设第二台湾医院档案”近日入选由浙江省档案局发布的第六批“浙江档案文献遗产名录”。    “这组档案真实记录了台湾义勇队在衢州设立台湾医院参与抗战的过程，是两岸同胞共御外侮的历史见证。”浙江衢州市档案馆保管利用处处长江潇说。    这组档案是2025年由衢州市两级档案部门系统挖掘并整理完成的，分别收藏在衢州市档案馆、衢州市衢江区档案馆和衢州江山市档案馆，包括函电、会议记录、报刊等。江潇说，“第二台湾医院”1940年12月在衢州成立，1942年5月，在衢州沦陷前夕撤离。    据江潇介绍，1940年10月4日，侵华日军军机飞临衢州城区上空并投下大量携带病菌的麦粒、小米、布片、棉花、跳蚤等物，对衢州实施细菌战，而档案中一份1941年3月20日的《衢县鼠疫防疫紧急会议纪要》中就有第二台湾医院参加会议的记录。

三 | 1942年5月，日军发动浙赣战役，企图夺取有空军机场的衢州，第二台湾医院的医护人员一直工作到衢州沦陷前夕。    据档案资料记载，日军空袭时，第二台湾医院的医护人员撤退到城外的乡下，空袭结束后，他们立即赶回城里救治伤员。在衢州沦陷前夕，台湾义勇队附设第二医院经江山转移到福建。    “最近，我们还在贵州省档案馆找到了一封信函。当时，衢州流行疟疾，第二台湾医院于1942年2月写信给驻扎贵州的中国红十字会总会救护总队，向对方申请支援特效药奎宁。”江潇说，这组档案以及最新发现的这一信函填补了台湾义勇队开展医疗救助的史实空白，是研究台湾义勇队在浙活动历史的宝贵资料，也见证了在抗战期间，台湾爱国志士们以自己医学专业技能，救助受难同胞的大爱情怀。    从2002年开始，浙江省档案局开始发布“浙江档案文献遗产名录”，至今已经发布了六批共83项。

Current article:http://753.zhouangnaoguangsundianzhenmou.cfd/8vo/20260826/7372.html

Published on:11:09:44